Picture 1 of 1
Stock photo
Picture 1 of 1
Stock photo
Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects : The Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge by Paul Lambert (2015, Trade Paperback)
Rarewaves (644577)
98.2% positive feedback
Price:
US $71.56
ApproximatelyPHP 4,036.84
+ $3.99 shipping
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Condition:
Oops! Looks like we're having trouble connecting to our server.
Refresh your browser window to try again.
About this product
Product Identifiers
PublisherUniversity Press of America, Incorporated
ISBN-100761865586
ISBN-139780761865582
eBay Product ID (ePID)208757600
Product Key Features
Number of Pages494 Pages
Publication NameTelevision Courtroom Broadcasting Effects : the Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge
LanguageEnglish
Publication Year2015
SubjectAmerican Government / Judicial Branch, Trial Practice, Media & the Law, General, Legal Writing, Courts
TypeTextbook
Subject AreaLaw, Political Science
AuthorPaul Lambert
FormatTrade Paperback
Dimensions
Item Height1.4 in
Item Weight25.8 Oz
Item Length8.9 in
Item Width6 in
Additional Product Features
Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition23
ReviewsQuestions many of the assumptions. . . as well as raising several other issues that have not been extensively addressed. . . a new, interesting and useful perspective to the discussion and debate., It recounts the arguments for and against. . . and reveals most of them to be self-serving assertions with next to no evidence to support them. . . it takes the claims and counterclaims seriously, and sets out a sensible approach to replace hot air with hard evidence. This topic is timely. Courts are under pressure to revise their rules. It will become the indispensible read for everyone interested in the topic., [This book] is the most comprehensive research-based assessment of the pros and cons of television broadcasting available on the market today. . . All those of us with an interest in open justice will welcome this book as making a major contribution to the debate, being perhaps the only book on the market that provides a totally objective assessment of the evidence to date., This book is a corrective. First, it recounts the arguments for and against television in courtrooms, and reveals most of them to be self-serving assertions with next to no evidence to support them. Second, it takes the claims and counterclaims seriously, and sets out a sensible approach to replace hot air with hard evidence. This topic is timely. Courts are under pressure to revise their rules. It will become the indispensable read for everyone interested in the topic.
IllustratedYes
Dewey Decimal791.456554
Table Of Content1 Introduction 2 The Supreme Court and the Research Challenge 3 Camera Developments in US 4 Cameras: The UK Perspective 5 What Exactly is Courtroom Broadcasting? 6 What is Television Courtroom Broadcasting (TCB)? 7 Are There TCB Genres and Formats? 8 General (Non Social Science) Research Literature 9 General (Non Social Science) Research Themes 10 Empirical Research and Themes 11 The Psychology Challenge 12 The Distraction Challenge 13 The Location Challenge 14 Education Effects Research 15 Education Effects Challenge 16 TCB Effects: Meeting the Research Challenges 17 The First TCB Eye Tracking Demonstration 18 Conclusion Appendix 1: Select General Literature on Courtroom Broadcasting Appendix 2: Summary and Categorisation of Supreme Court Effects Issues and Concerns Appendix 3: General (Non Social Science) Research Literature Bibliography Index /br>Index
SynopsisCourt and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with--and sometimes even embrace--technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner., Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with-and sometimes even embrace-technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner., The courts have had to deal with the increasing amount of technology. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. Despite three Supreme Court cases on this issue, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. This book analyzes these cases and the effects broadcasting has on the courts.
Be the first to write a review
