Argumentation Library: Giving Reasons : A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory by Lilian Bermejo Luque (2013, Trade Paperback)

Rarewaves (643529)
98.2% positive feedback
Price:
US $191.76
ApproximatelyPHP 10,773.27
+ $3.99 shipping
Estimated delivery Tue, 24 Jun - Fri, 4 Jul
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. If you use an eBay shipping label, it will be deducted from your refund amount.
Condition:
Brand New

About this product

Product Identifiers

PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISBN-10940073784X
ISBN-139789400737846
eBay Product ID (ePID)22038653542

Product Key Features

Number of PagesXvi, 209 Pages
LanguageEnglish
Publication NameGiving Reasons : a Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory
SubjectEpistemology, General, Rhetoric, Logic, Linguistics / General
Publication Year2013
TypeTextbook
AuthorLilian Bermejo Luque
Subject AreaPhilosophy, Language Arts & Disciplines
SeriesArgumentation Library
FormatTrade Paperback

Dimensions

Item Height0.2 in
Item Weight16 Oz
Item Length9.3 in
Item Width6.1 in

Additional Product Features

Intended AudienceScholarly & Professional
Dewey Edition23
ReviewsFrom the reviews: "Bermejo-Luque's book Giving Reasons has the ambition of developing a new theoretical approach to argumentation that integrates logical, dialectical and rhetorical aspects. The author uses speech act theory to realize her ideal of 'a linguistic-pragmatic approach' to argumentation. ... provide a coherent, systematic and comprehensive model for argument analysis and evaluation which overcomes the shortcomings of the current models and approaches to argumentation. ... Giving Reasons will be of interest to argumentation theorists, as it raises some important issues." (C. Andone, Argumentation, Vol. 26, 2012)
Series Volume Number20
Number of Volumes1 vol.
IllustratedYes
Dewey Decimal808.53
Table Of ContentPreface.- I Argumentation and Its Study.- II Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation'.- III Acts of Arguing.- IV The Logical Dimension of Argumentation.- V The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation.- VI The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation.- VII Argumentation Appraisal.- References.
SynopsisThis book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized. The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman's New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reasoning and arguing., Preface.- I Argumentation and Its Study.- II Why Do We Need a New Theory of Argumentation?.- III Acts of Arguing.- IV The Logical Dimension of Argumentation.- V The Dialectical Dimension of Argumentation.- VI The Rhetorical Dimension of Argumentation.- VII Argumentation Appraisal.- References., This book provides a new, linguistic approach to Argumentation Theory. Its main goal is to integrate the logical, dialectical and rhetorical dimensions of argumentation in a model providing a unitary treatment of its justificatory and persuasive powers. This model takes as its basis Speech Acts Theory in order to characterize argumentation as a second-order speech act complex. The result is a systematic and comprehensive theory of the interpretation, analysis and evaluation of arguments. This theory sheds light on the many faces of argumentative communication: verbal and non-verbal, monological and dialogical, literal and non-literal, ordinary and specialized.The book takes into consideration the major current comprehensive accounts of good argumentation (Perelman's New Rhetoric, Pragma-dialectics, the ARG model, the Epistemic Approach) and shows that these accounts have fundamental weaknesses rooted in their instrumentalist conception of argumentation as an activity oriented to a goal external to itself. Furthermore, the author addresses some challenging meta-theoretical questions such as the justification problem for Argumentation Theory models and the relationship between reasoning and arguing.
LC Classification NumberP1-1091
No ratings or reviews yet
Be the first to write a review