|Listed in category:
Have one to sell?

Vintage 80's Silk Abstract Colorful Floral Top Sz Med

Condition:
not specified
Price:
US $21.98
ApproximatelyPHP 1,291.73
Postage:
US $4.68 (approx PHP 275.04) Standard Postage. See detailsfor shipping
Located in: Santa Maria, California, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Thu, 27 Jun and Tue, 2 Jul to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the postage service selected, the seller's postage history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Buyer pays for return shipping. See details- for more information about returns
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)

Seller information

Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:395397247867
Last updated on Jun 21, 2024 18:00:51 PHTView all revisionsView all revisions

Item specifics

Brand
Silkland
Size Type
Regular
Decade
1980s
Color
Multi-Color
Style
Shirt
Original/Reproduction
Original
Material
100% Silk
Look
New Wave
Size (Women's)
M/L

Item description from the seller

ShellyRoseResells

ShellyRoseResells

100% positive feedback
134 items sold
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
5.0
Reasonable shipping cost
4.7
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (41)

c***h (22)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Item arrived as described and on time. Thanks!
e***q (332)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Great seller
s***y (16)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
The vest is exactly what I wanted. It arrived quickly. The only glitch is that the vest has a flaw on the inner part of the vest. It looks like a tiny piece of black fabric is woven into the ivory fabric. I can live with it, but if the vest was a “second” it should have been noted.