|Listed in category:
Have one to sell?

Monopoly San Diego Edition 90s Real Estate Board Game Usaopoly Sealed

Condition:
Used
slight tear on seal (see picture #3)
Price:
US $70.00
ApproximatelyPHP 4,069.53
Postage:
Free Economy Postage. See detailsfor shipping
Located in: Oceanside, California, United States
Delivery:
Estimated between Wed, 29 May and Mon, 3 Jun to 43230
Delivery time is estimated using our proprietary method which is based on the buyer's proximity to the item location, the postage service selected, the seller's postage history, and other factors. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.
Returns:
30 days return. Seller pays for return shipping. See details- for more information about returns
Coverage:
Read item description or contact seller for details. See all detailsSee all details on coverage
(Not eligible for eBay purchase protection programmes)

Seller information

Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
eBay item number:355705114620

Item specifics

Condition
Used
An item that has been used previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections. See all condition definitionsopens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes
“slight tear on seal (see picture #3)”
Game Type
Board Game
Brand
USAopoly
Min. Number of Players
2 players
Type
Complete Game
Game Title
Monopoly
Year
1996
Theme
Finance
UPC
0700304000057

Item description from the seller

carlshopresale

carlshopresale

100% positive feedback
271 items sold
Usually responds within 24 hours

Detailed Seller Ratings

Average for the last 12 months

Accurate description
5.0
Reasonable shipping cost
5.0
Shipping speed
5.0
Communication
5.0

Seller feedback (109)

6***d (171)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Beautiful product, secure packaging, awesome experience! Everything arrived safe!
f***l (263)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
Excelente
v***s (14)- Feedback left by buyer.
Past month
Verified purchase
delivered as ordered, disc is pristine. Would use supplier again